{"found":true,"collection":"patterns","library_url":"https://www.grokbotdb.com/library/pat.researcher-reviewer-separation","generated":"2026-09-06T05:32:11Z","citation":["Quote the record id and its source_url (or provenance if there is no URL).","Include last_verified or observed_at when present. Do not present an old date as current.","If tier is community and confidence is low, say so. Do not launder it into a fact.","If the database does not hold the answer, say that. Do not invent Grok Bot product claims.","Contradictions are data: when conflicts_with is present, report both records rather than picking a favourite.","Deprecated and removed records stay visible. They are history, not current guidance."],"record":{"id":"pat.researcher-reviewer-separation","name":"The reviewer must reject, not improve","category":"evidence","problem":"A reviewer that politely improves the wording of an unsupported claim is not a control.","technique":"Separate the researcher from the reviewer, and require the reviewer to reject unsupported claims and list only blocking issues.","why_it_works":"Editing hides the failure; rejection surfaces it.","when_to_use":"Any research or content pipeline.","manual_ref":"5.6","evidence":"documented","related":["pat.one-owner-per-stage","pat.record-a-rejection","pat.evidence-contract"],"confidence":"high","first_seen":"2026-09-03","last_verified":"2026-09-03"}}